Caught on camera: should every driver have a dash cam in their car?

Caught on camera should every driver have a dash cam in their car

Drivers could be forgiven for thinking almost every other car, van, lorry or motorbike has a dash cam fitted to it. The pocket-size portable video devices have boomed in popularity, with an estimated four million dashboard-mounted cameras now on Britain’s roads.

And that number is only set to rise. When 29 leading vehicle insurers were questioned about dash cams, all said they would consider accepting dash cam footage in the event of a claim. Some companies go so far as to offer discounts to drivers for using a dash cam.

However, one of the UK’s leading road safety organisations has spoken out over concerns that footage from dash cams might take traffic police off the roads. And privacy campaigners have slammed the phenomenon of ‘vehicle voyeurs’. These are drivers who publicly share footage of other road users without their consent. Find out how objections are increasing to this widespread and relatively new gadget.

How popular are dash cams now?

In 2015, research company GfK claimed the UK market had boomed by 918 per cent over the previous year. It is estimated that four million drivers in Britain now use a dash cam. Some of Britain’s biggest retailers, from Argos and Amazon to Lidl and Tesco, now offer an expansive range of these devices. With prices ranging from less than £30 to almost £300, it’s big business.

Why have a dash cam?

Why have a dash cam?

We all like to think we’re safe drivers. But if an accident is caused by someone else, proving who was at fault is generally only possible if independent witnesses come forward. Otherwise it’s your word against the other party’s.

A dash cam can act as that witness. Assuming it records sufficient footage leading up to an accident, it can help prove who was at fault. It means insurance claims can be quickly settled and may even help save the innocent party from paying any excess charge. Because of that, some insurers offer a discount to drivers that use a dash cam.

Why aren’t they fitted to every car?

Dash cams are likely to be fitted as standard to more new cars, especially as self-driving technology reaches roads. Citroën already fits a dash cam to one of its best-selling hatchbacks, the C3. And the French firm’s parent company PSA, which also owns Peugeot, DS Automobiles and Vauxhall, says it wants to make in-car cameras as common as the steering wheel. To do so, it has formed a partnership with Garmin, one of the most successful manufacturers of high-tech car accessories.

How could dash cams be taking police off UK roads?

How could dash cams be taking police off UK roads

IAM RoadSmart, the UK’s biggest road safety charity, has warned that the surging number of drivers submitting video footage of wayward drivers to the police may lead to fewer traffic officers patrolling our roads.

Neil Greig, IAM RoadSmart’s director of policy and research, said: “It takes time for police to evaluate the footage, decide what to follow up, trace the driver, serve paperwork and then obtain a successful prosecution within legal time limits. Our main concern is that dash cams must not become a replacement for fully trained officers undertaking high profile roads policing.”

The road safety charity stresses that people should focus on improving their own standard of driving, rather view a dash cam as a substitute for better driving. It says accident prevention requires better driver training.

What are the privacy concerns over the rise in dash cams?

Dashboard cameras are intended to help prove what happened in the event of a crash. But increasingly, they are used as a way to humiliate bad drivers and earn advertising revenue in the process.

Whether it’s on YouTube, Facebook or Mail Online, the Internet is awash with footage from dash cams. But in some continental countries, including Belgium, Germany and Switzerland, the law restricts their use or says footage either can’t be shared in public or those posting must blur out number plates.

When were dash cams first used?

You can trace dash cams back to the first in-car cameras used in motor racing. In the late 1970s, sports promoters and television companies began to fit cameras to cars in the world’s leading race series, including the hugely popular NASCAR US stock car racing championship. Formula One followed this with the first live feed from an in-car camera in 1985. Around the same time, police in America started fitting cameras to patrol cars. As the technology evolved, the size and price of in-car cameras meant they became viable for sale to everyday drivers.

5 comments on “Caught on camera: should every driver have a dash cam in their car?

  1. Eric Hayman 15/09/2017 12:57 PM

    “in the event of a crash. ” The correct word is “accident”.

    • Robert McLoughlin 07/11/2017 10:58 AM

      Or even a ‘collision’?

      • Eric Hayman 21/04/2020 12:24 PM

        Sometimes. A collision is an impact between two moving objects, including people and animals. The maritime world gets it right: a ship hitting a dock is an allision.

        A vehicle hitting a house is an allision, not a collision. A moving vehicle hitting a stationary vehicle is an allision. Two moving vehicles hitting each other is a collision. A car skidding and flipping onto its roof – without hitting another moving object – is an allision. And no way is a car going off the road into a ditch a collision.

        But some silly policeman claimed “there is no such thing as an accident”, and demanded that the word be removed from the police vocabulary. He said the word should not be used because whatever goes wrong, it could be prevented by good, proper, correct driving. He said all ‘collisions’, ‘incidents’ – use what word you want – are the result of bad driving in one form or another.

        He ignored obvious causes such as drivers having heart attacks, sink holes in the road, bridges collapsing, lightning, a blowout for no apparent reason, anything beyond the driver’s control. Somehow, drivers should foresee every possibility and avoid the consequences.

        So “accident” got replaced by “collision, “incident”, etc. Despite an accident simply being something that was not intended, whether on the road or elsewhere. For example, there is a Rail Accident Investigation Branch – not a Rail Collision Investigation Branch.

        One police force – SORRY, service (!) – talks of “Single Vehicle Collisions”. And the country is awash with “Collision Investigation Officers”!!!

        When one swears to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth in court, we have the likelihood of police officers lying on oath by calling all road traffic accidents “collisions”. Just one example of today’s twisting of word meanings to suit only the users.

  2. Stephen Langdon 11/11/2017 10:31 PM

    Correct word is ‘Collision’; hence police phrase ‘RTC’. An accident is not preventable, a collision is. Collisions happen as a result of driver error.

  3. Eric Hayman 13/11/2017 11:03 AM

    Sorry. Stephen, but you are wrong. A collision is when two moving objects hit each other. When a moving object hits a stationary object it is an allision – normally a nautical term. Thanks to former chief constable of north Wales Richard Brunstrom – who wrongly claimed that every accident can be prevented – road traffic accidents are now frequently called collisions – hence RTCs, not RTAs. A car rolling over, or hitting a tree is not a collision. Some collisions do happen as a result of driver error; others happen for a variety of reasons that have nothing to do with driver error: animals running into the road; mechanical failure; burst tyres, etc. And they are all accidents that happen also to be collisions. My car insurance policy still correctly refers to accidents. There are an Air Accidents Investigation Branch, and a Rail Accident Investigation Branch.

Leave a Reply